Skip to main content

The Need to Reform the PBM "Middleman" Industry

As a pharmacist in East Tennessee for 30+ years, it’s personal for me that Congress act — and act soon — to lower the costs of prescription drugs. There’s no doubt we have to reform the ways PhRMA companies price prescription medicines and sometimes manipulate the system.

But equally important is the need to reform the practices and roles of Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) — shadowy middlemen whose lack of transparency, unjustifiable fees, and massive market consolidations have made them among the most profitable centers of our healthcare system that most folks have never heard of.

PBMs serve as intermediaries between health plans, pharmaceutical manufacturers and pharmacies, and PBMs establish networks for consumers to receive reimbursement for drugs. Although the primary function of a PBM initially was simply to create networks and process pharmaceutical claims, these entities have become one of the most profitable, problematic, least regulated and least understood aspects of our healthcare delivery system. 

Just three PBMs control 80% of the prescription drug market, and last year, they denied coverage to more than 1,150 medicines. They’ve exploited a lack of transparency and created conflicts of interest that have significantly distorted competition, reduced choices for consumers and ultimately increased the cost of drugs.

This has gained the attention of states, Congress, and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

I have been active on a number of fronts to bring greater transparency to the PBM industry, to end PBM anti-competitive practices, and to ensure the administration of prescription benefits Americans need to get and stay healthy is done in simpler and more cost-efficient ways.

Issues:Health Care